|
Central Asia has traditionally been a multicultural crossroads. Chinese,
Mongols, Tibetans, Turks, Arabs, Iranians, and Russians, among others,
have at various times ruled parts of the region. Indian Buddhist pilgrims,
Mongol soldiers, Chinese envoys, Persian traders, Turkic dancers, Russian
explorers, Genoese and Venetian merchants, British adventurers, and German
and Japanese archeologists have lived in or traveled through the area;
and in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the region captivated a
particularly fascinating (and eccentric) cast of characters.
Karl Meyer and Shareen Blair Brysac have had the good sense to base their
highly readable book on the diverse and often sharply perceptive individuals
drawn to Central Asia over the past two hundred years. This biographical
approach not only is entertaining but also permits the authors to touch
on a wide variety of subjects, ranging from theosophy to the vogue in
Europe for Kashmiri shawls to the excellent system of education in Scotland
and, finally, to the hazards of travel across Central Asia. They are blessed
that nineteenth-century Europeans and Americans of different social backgrounds
treated letters and diaries as serious undertakings. Lord Curzon, Viceroy
of India, and Alexander Burnes, British Resident in Kabul, did not dash
off bureaucratic memos or cursory notes. Instead they wrote careful, if
biased, letters describing the remarkable sights and political and military
dramas they witnessed in Central Asia. They and their contemporaries left
behind accounts of their involvement in and observations of the European
scramble for influence in the region. Moreover, the principal actors were
not the only diarists; lesser performers, including missionaries, journalists,
and wives and mistresses of officials set down their impressions on paper.
Almost every European visitor to the region seems to have written a report
or kept a diary.
Meyer and Brysac have capitalized on these splendid materials to offer
vignettes of European involvement in Central Asia. They write about Benjamin
Jowett, Curzon's professor in Balliol College at Oxford, whose ambition
was "to govern the world through my pupils." They describe the
visions and bizarre ideology of Madame Helena Blavatsky, the mystical
theosophist, and the opportunism of Dr. Joseph Wolff, son of a rabbi but
a seemingly ardent convert to Christianity who preceded the Jews for Jesus
movement by 150 years in his effort to "bring the light of the Gospels
to Jews and other unbelievers."
Nikolai M. Przhevalsky, the noted Russian explorer, rivets the authors'
attention because of his achievements and his unappealing personality.
A "conquistador imperialist," he led four expeditions that mapped
much of Central Asia, studied its flora and fauna, and discovered the
species of horse that today bears his name. Despite his lengthy sojourn
in Asia, he was contemptuous of the local people, "an explorer of
China who despised the Chinese."
Sven Hedin, the early-twentieth-century Swedish cartographer, simultaneously
impresses and repels the authors. An ardent advocate of the Nietzschean
concept of the "Superman," Hedin undertook the extremely dangerous
crossing of the daunting and inhospitable Taklamakan desert. He survived
this foolhardy effort, though at least two of his men died and others
were badly injured. Yet his expeditions resulted in the mapping of many
previously unknown regions of East Asia, and his books had a sizable readership
and elicited great interest in the area. (His unalloyed admiration for
the so-called Superman eventually prompted him to support the Third Reich,
despite his own heritage as the great-grandson of a rabbi.)
Nearly all of these figures played a role in the Great Game that afflicted
Central Asia in the nineteenth century. The Great Game originated with
Britain's efforts to protect India, the crown jewel of its empire. Russian
expansionism in Central Asia, which began as an attempt to create a buffer
zone against another Mongol-style onslaught from the east, appeared to
threaten British aspirations in India, spawning a Russo-English struggle
for power. Later the Japanese joined in, as did the Americans. Though
Meyer and Brysac allude to the complexities of this conflict, they focus
more on personalities than on politics. In fact, an analysis of the ramifications
of the Great Game would require considerable research in the British and
Russian archives on the diplomatic negotiations and the struggles between
the principal adversaries. By concentrating on individuals, the authors
emerge with a more colorful narrative.
A slight defect is their attempt to link the Great Game to power politics
in Asia in the twentieth century. Their argument that the Great Game was
a "prologue to the Cold War" is not convincing. The conflict
between the Western countries and the Soviet bloc was not simply a chess
game about territory. Different ideologies and visions of the world were
contested, and the struggle was not limited to Asia.
The intriguing story the authors tell so well far outweighs this minor
blemish. Tournament of Shadows takes
its place with and complements Peter Hopkirk's similarly readable Foreign
Devils on the Silk Road.
Morris Rossabi is the author of Khubilai
Khan and other books, and wrote the introduction to the recently published
Bounty from the Sheep.
|